Safety Culture and process enhancement in aviation

Safety Culture and process enhancement in aviation

Safety Culture and process enhancement in aviation

Safety culture is the collection of the beliefs, perceptions and values that employees share in relation to risks within an organization, such as a workplace or community. Safety culture is a part of organizational culture and has been described in a variety of ways.

 

Safety culture reflects individual, group and organisational attitudes, norms and behaviours.

Safety culture is not just a reflection of the individuals that make up an organisation; an organisation’s safety culture is more than the sum of its parts.

Secondly, a safety culture must recognise that safety culture is reflected in the value of, priority of and commitment to safety. An organisation with a strong safety culture values the importance of safety; it recognises that safety is a business imperative. Safety is also afforded the highest priority over commercial, operating, environmental and social pressures.

 

Ways to introduce safety management to the aviation industry

 

An element of safety culture that promotes safety in aviation is listed below –

1. Just Culture
Informed culture relies on a reporting culture which in turn relies on a Just Culture. All employees must clearly understand and recognise that it is unacceptable to punish all errors and unsafe acts regardless of their origins and circumstances while it is equally unacceptable to give blanket immunity from sanctions to all actions that could, or did, contribute to organisational accidents. A prerequisite for engineering a just culture is an agreed set of principles.

 

2. Reporting Culture
Most of the time in aviation safety, the issue is not whether the organisation has a reporting system; it is whether, as a matter of practice, errors, near misses, hazards and risks are reported. A reporting culture depends, in turn, on how the organisation handles blame and punishment. If blame is the routine response to error, then reports will not be forthcoming. If, on the other hand, blame is reserved for truly egregious behaviour, involving recklessness or malice, reporting in general will not be discouraged. Instead of a blanket no-blame approach, what is required? The reason, the argument argues, is a just culture.

Safety Culture and process enhancement in aviation

3. Informed Culture
Management fosters a culture where people understand the hazards and risks inherent in their areas of operation.
Personnel are provided with the necessary knowledge, skills and job experience to work safely, and they are encouraged to identify the threats to safety and to seek the changes necessary to overcome them. An informed culture relies on having a strong reporting culture.

 

4. Learning Culture
Reports are only effective if an organisation learns from them.

Learning will occur from both reactive and proactive safety assessments and is promoted by an inherent organisational willingness to adapt and improve.

 

5. Flexible Cultures
A culture of safety is flexible, in the sense that decision-making processes vary, depending on the urgency of the decision and the expertise of the people involved.

 

Risk Mis-perception

This is been found as that mis-perceptions of the seriousness of risks occur frequently at all levels. The perception of risk or people’s judgments of riskiness is influenced by different attributes of hazards, e.g., controllable-uncontrollable. Misjudgments of risks may cause risky behavior and inappropriate decisions with regard to safety measures and ordinary occupational accidents as well as large-scale accidents. Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science Attitudes to Safety Attitudes (especially management’s) in relation to safety, risk and production. Having accurate risk perceptions does not necessarily result in correct risk and safety-related behaviours. Ignorance or deliberate violations of safety rules and procedures are often due to employee attitudes towards risk and safety (HSC, 1993). Hale (2003) advances the shared purpose in safety performance, i.e., the involvement felt by all parties in the organisation, especially the workforce, in the process of defining, prioritising and controlling risk.

Temi Badmus

Temi Badmus is a Food scientist and an Art enthusiast. Her desire is to give a listening ear to people and to give an opportunity for everyone to be heard. She's a humorous and controversial writer, who believes all form of writing is audible if its done well. Temi Badmus is research oriented, dog lover; she is currently a mum to two brutal Jack Russell terrier male and female - "Cash" and Indie
. šŸ• The future is female... The future is Productive

More From Author

Safety requirement for assurance and promotion in aviation

Processes that enhances systematic growth of safety culture

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *